Dipi Sindh lifts ban on student unions after 38-year hiatus

ISLAMABAD:Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial has termed the National Assembly speaker rsquo s ruling, which rejected the opposition rsquo s no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Imran Khan on Sunday, ldquo unprecedented rdquo .Heading a f jordan ive-judge larger bench to hear a suo motu case regarding the ruling, the chief justice remarked that if the ruling was permitted then the Sindh High Court Bar Association counsel rsquo s statement would be relevant that Hitler rsquo s dictatorship was started from speaker rsquo s ruling.Chief Justice Bandial also said that opposition was considering victory on the no-confidence motion but asked whether the opposition was scared of going into fresh elections. He also posed the question whether National Assembly deputy air max donna speaker, who read the ruling, subverted the Constitution.Since Sunday, the bench was hearing the matter on a af1s white daily basis. During the hearing on Wednesday, the bench asked about the material on the basis of which the deputy s Taxk Bill on right to appeal in suo motu cases gets Senate s nod

ISLAMABAD:The Supreme Court (SC) set aside on Wednesday the objections raised by the registrar on former premier Imran Khan rsquo s petition against the recent amendments made to the country rsquo s accountability airforces law.Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan of the apex court resumed th dunks red e in-chamber hearing of the PTI chief 39 s appeal against the objections raised by the registrar rsquo s office.Imran Khan rsquo s counsel Khawaja Haris appeared before the court. The judge overrule adidas superstar damen d the objections after hearing the arguments,and ordered to number the petiion and fix it for hearing in open court.Read Imran threatens to spill the beansEarlier, the apex court rsquo s registrar office had raised five objections against the PTI rsquo s petition and stated that the petitioner had not highlighted what matters of public importance were involved in the enforcement of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution so as to directly invoke the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 184(3). ldquo The